If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only done When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were effectively mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
How much sway case legislation holds could vary by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances of your current case. To explore this concept, consider the following case regulation definition.
However, decisions rendered through the Supreme Court with the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues with the Constitution and federal law.
The ruling on the first court created case legislation that must be accompanied by other courts until or Unless of course either new law is created, or perhaps a higher court rules differently.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Just a few years ago, searching for case precedent was a challenging and time consuming activity, demanding people today to search through print copies of case law, or to pay for access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case law search prospects, and lots of sources offer free access to case legislation.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a possibility of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it truly is unclear the way it relates to any supplied situation, normally rendering judgments based on the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances with the case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for upcoming similar cases.
Some bodies are provided statutory powers to issue assistance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons obtaining their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to try and do away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals website with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the couple had two youthful children of their have at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report for the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair had youthful children.
Usually, only an appeal accepted through the court of previous resort will resolve this kind of differences and, for many reasons, this sort of appeals in many cases are not granted.
States also commonly have courts that manage only a specific subset of legal matters, for example family legislation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, would be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending around the relationship between the deciding court and the precedent, case legislation may be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision through the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is not strictly bound to follow the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by 1 district court in Ny just isn't binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning could help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions because of the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more